Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

font size: +

Questioning the values of the values-voter

|| Tell-a-Friend || Print

As someone who has campaigned against Gaddafi and Libya ever since “the mad dog of the Middle East” tried to pitch a tent next door to me at the residence he owns in Englewood, I was underwhelmed when President Obama had to be dragged kicking and screaming — by the French no less! — to use force to stop Gaddafi from slaughtering his own people. A president so out of step with the basic American values of upholding life and protecting freedom would seem vulnerable at the polls come November 2012. Yet values-voters have gained little traction against Obama and risk seeing him re-elected amid his pitifully weak leadership.

Here’s why.

Truth regardless of consequences

For 30-odd years, evangelical Christians and social conservatives have championed values as central to the American political agenda, promoting the integrity of the family and the sacredness of life. But a sober assessment of this noble effort would have to conclude that it has been a spectacular failure.

Values in America are at an all-time low. Not even a dent has been made in the divorce rate, which continues to hover at one in two, with women — once the staunchest believers in marriage — initiating three-quarters of all divorces, and 40 percent of Americans now maintaining that marriage is obsolete.

American culture has never been so valueless. While the Beatles sang four decades ago of not caring much for money “cause money can’t buy me love,” Travie McCoy found platinum with his 2010 song “I wanna be a billionaire so fricking bad, buy all of the things I never had.” Eighty-one percent of 18- to 25-year-olds surveyed in a Pew Research Center poll said getting rich is their generation’s most important or second-most-important life goal, while 51 percent said the same about being famous.

Reality TV capitalizes on this lust for fame by subjecting celebrity-starved contestants to every conceivable humiliation, while AOL News reports that teen girls are now trying to get pregnant just to appear on MTV’s Teen Mom.

Worst of all is the materialism and greed that continues to poison the American soul, leading to the near-collapse of a $10 trillion economy in 2008 that gave us homes that we never thought large enough, cars that were never new enough, and designer labels that were never fashionable enough. With Newsweek reporting that one out of three women is on an anti-depressant, studies show that shopping remains a woman’s foremost cure for unhappiness.

What went wrong?

My Christian brothers and social conservatives adopted a narrow definition of values that centered almost exclusively on opposition to gay marriage and abortion to the exclusion of virtually everything else. Gone was any discussion of civic virtue filling our lives better than an impulse purchase, of quiet acts of selflessness being superior to publicity-seeking stunts, of thrift and saving over consumption and indulgence, and time with family over time spent at the mall. No legislation has been proposed by social conservatives to close stores on Sundays — as they are in my neighborhood of Bergen County — and strengthen families through an American Sabbath.

Over the past few weeks the nation has watched the Grammys and Academy Awards without one public call for a publicly televised awards ceremony for soldiers earning a Purple Heart or the Congressional Medal of Honor. Less so have we heard any call for national legislation on a communal year of service for all high school graduates that would combat the growing narcissism of our youth.

While the divorce rate is at 50 percent and, according to the University of Denver, 70 percent of straight couples opt to cohabit as a substitution for marriage, we continue to fixate on the 7 percent of the population who are gay, even though, ironically, gays seem to be the only men left in America who still want to marry.

If social conservatives really wanted to strengthen the family, they would propose legislation making marital counseling tax-deductible so that couples in crisis could afford the help they need.

But writing recently in The Wall Street Journal, Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention castigated Indiana governor and presidential hopeful Mitch Daniels for advocating an abandonment of the GOP obsession with gay marriage and abortion because, as Land wrote, social conservatives “expect pro-life, pro-family legislation.”

Indeed they do.

But they now expect language that unifies, rather than divides, left and right. Abortion has been wrongly portrayed as a religious battle about the beginning of life when in reality it is a social issue about the death of love. This is not about how doctors treat a fetus but how men treat women. Would any liberal object to a values-based message that has men looking at women as more than mere sex objects? Can left and right not join together to propose tough legislation punishing deadbeat dads?

The recording industry — once an audio but now a visual medium — has all but erased the line separating music and soft porn with Madonna, Britney Spears, and Lady Gaga all becoming queens of pop as much for their scantily clad bodies as for their music. The left needs to join the right in promoting more Susan Boyles who are recognized for talent over cleavage.

In 2004, President George W. Bush, although reviled outside the United States, defeated John Kerry because 22 percent of the electorate voted for values as they reacted to 11 states offering referendums on gay marriage. Yet four years later, with the economy collapsing because of Wall Street excess and out-of-control consumer borrowing, Americans were searching for new values to address greed and materialism. Unbelievably, social conservatives responded with yet another campaign in California against gay marriage. The result of this abrogation of leadership was the utter marginalization of the evangelical voting block who could not prevent Barack Obama from capturing the White House.

Now, with a $13.9 trillion deficit that has every child born owing $33,000, values-voters would be wise to promote issues that directly address the American malaise lest we be sidelined again in 2012.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, founder of This World: The Values Network, is the international best-selling author of 25 books and has just published “Renewal: A Guide to the Values-Filled Life.”
The views in opinion pieces and letters do not necessarily reflect the views of The Jewish Standard. The comments posted on this Website are solely the opinions of the posters. Libelous or obscene comments will be removed.
|| Tell-a-Friend || Print

Stay tuned for the return of comments



Time to let the Confederacy finally die

On Palm Sunday in 1865 — that was April 9, just five days before Abraham Lincoln’s assassination — the formerly invincible Confederate general Robert E. Lee sat in the small house of a slave-owner named Wilmer McLean in the little town of Appomattox Court House, Virginia.

Earlier that day, Lee had tried and failed to battle his way into the city, which held vital supplies for his armies. He was quickly surrounded and outnumbered, and realizing it would be a losing battle, he’d agreed to meet with General Ulysses S. Grant to negotiate his surrender. Now, dressed in an immaculate uniform, he waited for Grant to arrive. As soon as Grant got there, Lee, the great terror of the Union armies, would surrender his own, the much-feared and renowned Army of Northern Virginia.



‘Zionism’ is not a dirty word


Jonathan Sacks should tell Jews to fight for Israel — not to surrender

This week, England’s former chief rabbi, Lord Jonathan Sacks, gave a speech described by the media as doom and gloom at a conference in Herzliya.

Rabbi Sacks admitted a belief that the BDS movement had succeeded in making the state of Israel a “divisive factor” in Jewish life, and he claimed that as a result, supporting Israel was “almost impossible” for European Jews.

It was an astonishingly defeatist speech, which is troubling enough. But most disturbing was the false dichotomy he presented to European Jews. In his own troubling words, he said, “Jews have been faced with a choice: live in Europe and criticize Israel or be silent, or leave Europe…” In other words, the only solutions left for Europe’s Jewish community is to embrace and succumb to BDS or get out. What he shockingly neglected to mention is the obvious third option: to stay in Europe, embrace Israel, and fight for the Jewish state.


2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31