Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

Rep. Rothman to Obama: Press Abbas to end incitement, resume talks

J Street objects to legislators’ call for Palestinian accountability as one-sided

 
|| Tell-a-Friend || Print
 
 

Rep. Steve Rothman (D-N.J.) and Steve Austria (R-Ohio) are calling on President Obama to press Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to return to peace negotiations and to end anti-Israel incitement by the Palestinian Authority. Meanwhile, J Street, the controversial pro-peace-process advocacy group, is blasting the congressmen’s effort as too single-issue focused and unfairly hard on Abbas.

Last week J Street released a statement objecting to a letter co-authored by the congressmen and soon to go out to President Obama. J Street contends that the letter, for which the congressmen are collecting signatures, focuses inordinately on incitement at the expense of other issues. In a telephone interview on Tuesday, J Street staffer Amy Spitalnick told The Jewish Standard that the organization disagrees with what the staffer characterized as the letter’s implicit blame of Abbas “in the context of this horrific Itamar massacre.”

The congressmen’s letter references the murders, earlier this month, of five members of the Fogel family, who lived in the west bank settlement of Itamar, and condemns the PA’s current refusal engage in peace talks and to cease incitement.

A draft of the letter, released by Rothman, reads, in part: “We are sure that you share our disappointment in President Mahmoud Abbas’s decision to withdraw from peace talks in October of last year and his stubborn refusal to reengage as a willing partner for peace with Israel.… Unfortunately, we live in a time when [a group called] the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades [of Imad Mughniyeh] will rush to take credit for the horrific, inhuman, and brutal attack in Itamar against the Fogel family, including three of their children, an 11-year-old, 4-year-old, and 3-month-old. This must serve as a wakeup call that the current state of affairs is dangerous and unacceptable.”

Rothman, in a telephone interview with the Standard on Monday, said the goal of his and Austria’s letter is two-fold: to urge Obama to press Abbas to resume peace talks without preconditions and to end the culture of incitement, which he charges the PA has failed to do.

“The thrust of our letter … is to not only point out how libelous and vile we find the PA’s failures to confront incitement to violence against Jews and Israelis by members of the PA and their sympathizers, but also to condemn the PA’s refusal to come to the negotiating table to work out the terms for a two-state solution,” he said. Regarding J Street’s statement, Rothman added, “Curiously, J Street makes no mention of the PA’s failure to return to the negotiating table. I find that shocking and inexcusable, especially since J Street speaks of [wanting] a two-state resolution to the conflict.”

In its statement, J Street characterized the congressmen’s appeal as one-sided, disproportionately focused on incitement, and misleading.

The J Street statement reads, in part: “In our view, it is preferable for Congressional statements on the conflict to address the actions and words of both parties.… To frame the current impasse in the peace process as the result simply of instances of incitement by Palestinians ignores other actions that impede peace, specifically ongoing and intensifying Israeli settlement activity in Palestinian territory.… J Street objects to the letter’s use of the horrifying murder of an Israeli family.… To highlight this act … and to do so without also mentioning President Abbas’ quick condemnation is misleading.”

J Street’s Spitalnick told the Standard that although J Street “is firmly opposed to incitement,” the organization felt Rothman’s letter was disproportionately focused on it.

“To make this issue of incitement the only issue undermining prospects for peace does a disservice to actually achieving a peace agreement,” she said. “Another important thing … is that the letter implicitly lays the blame on President Abbas, even in the context of this horrific Itamar massacre, for incitement. This is a leader that has been applauded in conjunction with Prime Minister [Salam] Fayyad by Israeli and American security forces for work to root out violence.”

Rothman fired back against J Street’s defense of Abbas, saying, “Notwithstanding the fact Abbas publicly declared the murders in Itamar to be inhuman and without justification, he did not condemn his fellow Palestinians for taking credit for such a despicable and murderous act.”

Spitalnick responded, “Not that I’m defending Al Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades — but then they said they didn’t take credit for it. So the facts are very iffy still.” (According to the Jerusalem Post, officials of Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades — which is listed by the U.S. State Department as a terrorist organization — “denied that the attack came from within their ranks, telling Al Hayat that they are not connected to the Imad Mugniyeh group.”)

Spitalnick added that J Street supports another congressional letter, sent to Obama last week, that called for maintaining current levels of foreign aid to both Israel and the Palestinian Authority and for U.S. leadership in promoting a two-state solution. That letter, which had 116 signatories, was co-authored by Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.).

Rothman also spoke about the U.S. State Department’s recent, explicit condemnation of a March 13 ceremony in a town square in Al-Bireh, near Ramallah, for Dalal Mughrabi. The square was named and a plaque dedicated in memory of Mughrabi, who directed the hijacking of two buses that resulted in the murders of 37 Israelis, including 13 children. Members of Abbas’ Fatah faction were reportedly on hand.

“In my opinion that’s just the latest in dozens of examples over past several years of the PA not taking sufficient action to publicly condemn or prevent the glorification and celebration of the murderers of Israeli men, women, and children,” Rothman said.

 

More on: Rep. Rothman to Obama: Press Abbas to end incitement, resume talks

 
 
 

Amid violence, pen pals in Congress focus on Israel

WASHINGTON – It happens almost like clockwork: Something happens in the Middle East, and it reverberates across the Atlantic with new letters from the U.S. Congress.

With so many relatively new members looking to establish their pro-Israel credentials, the reaction in Congress to the recent violence in Israel was particularly swift.

“American pressure needs to be exerted on the Palestinians, not the Israelis, to make steps toward achieving peace,” said a March 18 letter to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton from the Republican Study Committee, the conservative caucus of Republicans from the House of Representatives.

 
 
 
|| Tell-a-Friend || Print
 
 

Stay tuned for the return of comments

 

Beyond sanctions and kerfuffles

A look at the Iran deal Netanyahu wants to avoid

WASHINGTON — When Benjamin Netanyahu faces the Congress next month, two things are unlikely to come up in his speech: a consideration of diplomatic protocol and an analysis of the efficacy of sanctions.

Media attention before the speech has focused on the diplomatic crisis set off by the invitation to the Israeli prime minister from U.S. House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), who kept President Barack Obama in the dark, and the ensuing political tussle between backers and opponents of new sanctions on Iran.

But Ron Dermer, the Israeli ambassador to Washington who coordinated the invitation with Boehner, has made it clear that Netanyahu’s focus on March 3 will be on the bigger picture: what Netanyahu thinks will be a bad nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1 nations, the sobriquet for the United States, Russia, China, France, Germany, and Britain.

 

French Jews face uncertain future

A look at some stories from a local leader

In the wake of the terror attacks at the Charlie Hebdo magazine office and the Hyper Cacher grocery store — a kosher market — I participated in a Jewish Agency mission to Paris.

Our delegation of Americans and Israelis arrived last week to show solidarity with the French Jewish community. We also sought to better understand the threat of heightened anti-Semitism in France (and, indirectly, elsewhere in Europe). We met with more than 40 French Jewish community leaders and activists, all of them open to sharing their concerns.

On January 7, Islamist terrorists murdered a dozen Charlie Hebdo staffers as retribution for the magazine’s cartoon depictions of the prophet Mohammed. Two days later, another terrorist held a bunch of Jewish grocery shoppers hostage, killing four, which French President Francois Hollande acknowledged as an “appalling anti-Semitic act.”

 

When rabbis won’t speak about Israel

AJR panel to offer tips for starting a conversation

Ironically, what should be a unifying topic for Jews often spurs such heated discussion that rabbis tend to avoid it, said Ora Horn Prouser, executive vice president and dean of the Academy for Jewish Religion.

Dr. Prouser, who lives in Franklin Lakes and is married to Temple Emanuel of North Jersey’s Rabbi Joseph Prouser, said that she heard a lot over the summer from rabbis and other spiritual leaders. They said that they were “unable or not comfortable talking about Israel in their synagogues,” she reported.

“It didn’t come from a lack of love,” Dr. Horn said. “They’re deeply invested in Israel, and yet they felt they could not get into a conversation without deeply offending other parts of their community.”

 

RECENTLYADDED

Israel launching drive to void Goldstone Report

WASHINGTON – Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel would launch an international campaign to cancel the Goldstone Report after its author, ex-South African Judge Richard Goldstone, wrote in an Op-Ed in the Washington Post that Israel did not intentionally target civilians as a policy during the Gaza War, withdrawing a critical allegation in the report.

Netanyahu said he had asked his security adviser, Ya’akov Amidror, to establish a committee focused on “minimizing the damage caused” by the report.

 

Facebook and Zuckerberg does an about-face and deletes Palestinian page calling for a Third Intifada

Following widespread criticism, a Facebook page calling for a third Palestinian intifada against Israel was removed on March 29. On the Facebook page, Palestinians were urged to launch street protests following Friday May 15 and begin an uprising as modelled by similar uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Morocco, and Jordan. Killing Jews en masse was emphasized.

According to the Facebook page, “Judgment Day will be brought upon us only once the Muslims have killed all of the Jews.” The page had more than 340,000 fans. However, even while the page was removed, a new page now exists in its place with the same name,  “Third Palestinian Intifada.”

 

Did heated rhetoric play role in shooting of Giffords?

WASHINGTON – The 8th District in southern Arizona represented by U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords comprises liberal Tucson and its rural hinterlands, which means moderation is a must. But it also means that spirits and tensions run high.

Giffords’ office in Tucson was ransacked in March following her vote for health care reform — a vote the Democrat told reporters that she would cast even if it meant her career. She refused to be cowed, but she also took aim at the hyped rhetoric. She cast the back-and-forth as part of the democratic process.

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31