Subscribe to The Jewish Standard free weekly newsletter

 
font size: +
 

3 rabbis and a pope

High praise for Francis after visit to Vatican

 
|| Tell-a-Friend || Print
 
 
image
Pope Francis is presented with a picture of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel and Cardinal Augustin Bea by Rabbi Noah Marams, center, and other representatives of the American Jewish Committee.

“This man is a mensch.”

Standing alone, this is an unremarkable sentence.

But from a rabbi about a pope?

This was what Rabbi Shmuel Goldin of Congregation Ahavath Torah in Englewood, the president of the Orthodox Rabbinical Council of America, said about Pope Francis.

Here’s another thought, from Rabbi Noam Marans of Teaneck, the Conservative rabbi who is director of interreligious and intergroup relations at the American Jewish Committee.

“Pope Francis is the quintessential religious symbol par excellence; unassuming, unscripted, warm. It is a religious experience to be in his presence.”

And a third, from Rabbi Dr. Eugene Korn of New Milford, the Orthodox rabbi who is the American director of the Center for Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation in Israel.

“He is very warm.”

The three of them were among the 25 or so Jews who met with the pope last week. Each represents his organization in the umbrella group called the International Jewish Committee of Interreligious Consultations (which is abbreviated as Ijcic, uneuphoniously pronounced Idge-kick). Ijcic is the official liaison between the Jewish world and the Vatican.

“The pope always meets with Ijcic first, before any other Jewish organization,” Marans said. “It is a remarkable Jewish organization — not only is it able to represent the Jewish people with the Catholic church, which is in and of itself an enormous miracle, but it also involves intra-Jewish relationships. It combines Reform, Conservative, and Orthodox Jews with defense organizations like the AJC, and ADL, and others — which is a nice blessing.”

Marans was impressed with what he thought of as Francis’s genuine goodness, and talked about the world’s introduction to him when he was elected pope in March. Francis — then Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires — had not expected the elevation. “We all knew, the moment he was introduced to the world when he stepped out on that balcony, that this was a man who had not expected to be remaining in Vatican City,” Marans said.

“And there was an added gift,” he said. “We thought we were in the post-golden age of Catholic-Jewish relations, because how do you top Nostre Aetate?” (That was the 1965 papal declaration, a result of the meeting later called Vatican II, that dealt with the ties between Catholics and Jews, and told Catholics that Jews were not responsible for the death of Christ. It marked a huge turning point in the relationship between Jews and Catholics.)

“And then there was Pope John Paul II and even Benedict XVI, even despite his detractors. How do you top them? What do you do for an encore?

“And then we were given Pope Francis, who has written only one book — and that book was co-authored by a rabbi.” (Bergoglio and Rabbi Abraham Skorka wrote “Sobre el Cielo y la Tierra” — “On Heaven and Earth” — a theological dialogue on issues of mutual interest.)

“Tell that to your grandparents and see if they believe you!”

And what did Marans think? “Pinch me!” he said.

The four AJCommittee representatives at the meeting gave Francis a copy of a photograph of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel and Cardinal Augustin Bea, “who was the highest ecumenical officer at the Vatican during Vatican II, and was a key player in the development of Nostra Aetate,” Marans said. Although he got a sense of Francis as a man who “doesn’t light up much — he just lit up. Either he knew the photo or knew the men in it, but he just lit up.”

Much of the meeting was theater, Marans said, but that was fine. Spectacle has its place. “The hard work of Catholic-Jewish relations happens on the sidelines, not in the theatrical moments, but those moments still are meaningful because they are statements to the world.

“Even with all the challenges the Catholic church is facing, people still take the visuals of a pope very seriously.

“For example, when John Paul II put a note into the Kotel,” Jerusalem’s Western Wall, as he did during his 2000 trip to Israel, “look what that did for how the Jewish people perceived him.”

Marans added that something the pope said went well beyond theater and likely will be of lasting importance. The pope, condemning hatred in general and anti-Semitism in particular, said that because of Christianity and Judaism’s common roots, “Christians cannot be anti-Semitic!” That was a powerful sentiment, powerfully expressed.

“It’s not like there are no challenges,” Marans concluded. “The difference, though, is that now the challenges are resolved — or at least discussed — among friends. That is a very different world than the world of Jews being on the receiving end of anti-Semitism, that ultimately led to violence and catastrophe for Jews in the Shoah.”

Korn also was struck by Francis’s message. “He said that to be anti-Semitic is in fact to be anti-Christian,” Korn said. “He means believing or true Christians.”

Korn said that each member of the Jewish delegation got a minute or two to talk to the pope. “I thanked him for committing to come to visit the State of Israel,” he reported. “It’s important both for political and religious reasons. I asked him to come as soon as possible.

“One of the significant aspects of his visit would be that he would be the first pope in a row to visit — John Paul did, and so did Benedict. The Jewish understanding is that if you do something three times, it becomes tradition. We hope this would set a tradition in the Vatican, that visiting Israel is something a pope does.”

“It was a fascinating meeting,” Goldin said.

“We stand at a very interesting juncture in our relationship with the church. Over the last 50 years since Nostra Aetate, the church really has rewritten its doctrine. Since that point, there have been a lot of steps taken to cement the relationship between the Jewish community and the church in terms of mutual respect and understanding.

“I had always known, but I guess I still never quite realized, the depth of the change the church needed to do to make that possible.

“The pope’s words were encouraging, and he came across as warm and human and humble,” Goldin concluded. “We walked across the room where his throne is. It’s where the other popes used to sit. He won’t sit on it. When he spoke to us, he was on our level.

 
|| Tell-a-Friend || Print
 
 

Stay tuned for the return of comments

 

‘It’s valuable to hear both sides’

Ridgewood man discusses Israeli, Palestinian narratives

Jonathan Emont — a 2008 graduate of Ridgewood High School who celebrated his bar mitzvah at the town’s Temple Israel and Jewish Community Center — always has felt a deep attachment to the state of Israel.

Still, the 23-year-old said, he never expected that country to be at the center of his professional life.

Things changed, however, when the recent Swarthmore College graduate went to Israel on a tour the America-Israel Friendship League offered to young journalists.

“I did journalism in college,” he said, explaining that although he majored in history, he also was the editor of Swarthmore’s Daily Gazette.

 

Walling off, reaching out

Teaneck shul offers discussion of Women of the Wall

It is not an understatement to say that the saga of Women of the Wall is a metaphor for much of the struggle between tradition and change in Israel.

Founded 25 years ago by a group of Israeli and non-Israeli women whose religious affiliations ran from Orthodox to Reform, it has been a flashpoint for the fight for pluralism in Israel, as one side would define it, or the obligation to hold onto God-given mandates on the other.

As its members and supporters fought for the right to hold services in the women’s section, raising their voices in prayer, and later to wear tallitot and read from sifrei Torah, and as their opponents grew increasingly violent in response, it came to define questions of synagogue versus state and showcase both the strengths and the flaws of Israel’s extraordinary parliamentary system. It also highlighted rifts between American and Israeli Jews.

 

Yet more Pew

Local rabbis talk more about implications of look at American Jews

The Pew Research Center’s study of American Jews, released last October, really is the gift that keeps on giving.

As much as the Jewish community deplores the study’s findings, it seems to exert a magnetic pull over us, as if it were the moon and we the obedient tides. We can’t seem to stop talking about it. (Of course, part of that appeal is the license it gives us to talk, once again, about ourselves. We fascinate ourselves endlessly.)

That is why we found ourselves at the Kaplen JCC on the Palisades in Tenafly last Wednesday night, with the next in the seemingly endless series of snow-and-ice storms just a few hours away, discussing the Pew study yet again.

 

RECENTLYADDED

Israel launching drive to void Goldstone Report

WASHINGTON – Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel would launch an international campaign to cancel the Goldstone Report after its author, ex-South African Judge Richard Goldstone, wrote in an Op-Ed in the Washington Post that Israel did not intentionally target civilians as a policy during the Gaza War, withdrawing a critical allegation in the report.

Netanyahu said he had asked his security adviser, Ya’akov Amidror, to establish a committee focused on “minimizing the damage caused” by the report.

 

Facebook and Zuckerberg does an about-face and deletes Palestinian page calling for a Third Intifada

Following widespread criticism, a Facebook page calling for a third Palestinian intifada against Israel was removed on March 29. On the Facebook page, Palestinians were urged to launch street protests following Friday May 15 and begin an uprising as modelled by similar uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Morocco, and Jordan. Killing Jews en masse was emphasized.

According to the Facebook page, “Judgment Day will be brought upon us only once the Muslims have killed all of the Jews.” The page had more than 340,000 fans. However, even while the page was removed, a new page now exists in its place with the same name,  “Third Palestinian Intifada.”

 

Did heated rhetoric play role in shooting of Giffords?

WASHINGTON – The 8th District in southern Arizona represented by U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords comprises liberal Tucson and its rural hinterlands, which means moderation is a must. But it also means that spirits and tensions run high.

Giffords’ office in Tucson was ransacked in March following her vote for health care reform — a vote the Democrat told reporters that she would cast even if it meant her career. She refused to be cowed, but she also took aim at the hyped rhetoric. She cast the back-and-forth as part of the democratic process.

 
 
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30